Wide-field polarimetry

Wide-field polarimetry

 

This is an area of active ongoing investigation. Users are advised to first view the page on measurements of the primary beams. While polarisation purity is very good on boresight, performance gradually degrades further away from the pointing centre. Additionally, standard calibration techniques cannot correct for severe effects being generated above 1380 MHz and below 1 GHz. Wide-field polarimetry at UHF, L and S-band is presented in significant detail in the memo by Hugo & Perley (2024). Also, refer to the Polarisation calibration section on the help desk.

 

For polarimetry above 1380 MHz, or past the half-power beam width of the primary beam, please have a look at our page on the MeerKAT primary beam measurements.

For UHF-band polarimetry above 1000 MHz, or past 0.23 degrees offset from the phase centre, please refer to the memo “Absolute linear polarization angle calibration using planetary bodies for MeerKAT and JVLA at cm wavelengths” (Hugo & Perley, 2024)

Also, please see Hugo & Perley (2024) for S-band polarimetry, it is demonstrated that instrumental polarisation is most severe at the top of the S0 sub-band (1750 - 2625 MHz), yet the degree of contamination is lower than that in the L-band. In the S2 sub-band (2187 - 3062 MHz), variability is significant with parallactic angle, exceeding a few per cent near the edge of the beam and beyond. Although there is less variation with parallactic angle at the S4 sub-band (2625 - 3500 MHz), distinct “notches” appear beyond 3 GHz, and these increase in magnitude to several per cent beyond a 0.17-degree offset from the phase centre.

 

More details will follow as our understanding evolves. Users concerned about polarimetry are welcome to contact the MeerKAT Service Desk (support tickets can be raised on the MeerKAT Service Desk) for advice on their specific use case.

 

  • It may be possible to push up to 1500 MHz if the field of view is severely restricted. Please consult the documentation on the primary beam measurements and the memo Hugo & Perley (2024) for a more recent analysis.